Reading Plan: The Book of Psalms in One Month

January 7th, 2012 1 comment

The two most popular reading plans I have come across for the book of Psalms, in order to finish the book in 30 days, are to read five psalms per day.  One way to do this is to read it straight through, five psalms per day (e.g. 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, etc.).  The advantage of this plan is that it is fairly straightforward and simple, and easy to keep track where you are.

Sermon: Understanding the Fall (Gen 4:1-8)

August 3rd, 2011 No comments

Well, I haven't posted in a while, but I wanted to share a sermon I gave at New Springs Church, in Holly Springs, NC, where my good friend Ron Tutor is the pastor.

Here's the link to the page the sermon is at:

http://newspringschurch.podbean.com/2011/08/03/understanding-the-fall-gen-41-8/

Andy

 

PS…There's a big pop about halfway into the sermon when the microphone box fell off my belt!  Maybe it'll make you jump!

ETS presentation time slot

July 1st, 2011 No comments

Got an e-mail a few days from the folks at the ETS on when I could be presenting my paper.  For those of you going in November, I'll be presenting a paper called "Hearing Psalm 102 within the Literary Context of the Hebrew Psalter."  Right now I'm scheduled to present on Nov 17 at 11:00.  The paper will be a shortened version of one I read at the TST Biblical seminar in March.  If you want to read the full version, click on "Papers" above and you will find it.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Chain blog #12 – Cooperative Division: We Are United in our Division

June 30th, 2011 4 comments
I think this is the twelfth post in the chain blog first started by Alan a few weeks ago (all other links and rules at the bottom). It’s been a great time reading through all the posts, and in the latest one by Alan he challenged us to move forward a bit and really start looking at what some legitimate reasons for dividing the body of Christ. Two posts have been given in response before me. In the first, Jonathan argued that maybe we are looking at division from the wrong angle. Perhaps we really are united as one church, even if there are differences in some doctrines and practices. It’s up to us, individually as laypeople and leaders to agree that we are one. The second post, by Fred, argued differently, that in order for us to be united we need to make Jesus Christ our center. All our divisions are the result of taking our focus off of Jesus.
 
There’s much to these two positions, but it still seems like we’re skirting the issue. We have to admit that we are divided — I mean look at all the thousands of denominations in the States alone. We meet with those like-minded with us in certain issues, and are willing to “agree to disagree” with others. For instance, in the church I go to, a Baptist church, we agree on the main outlines of the Gospel, basic doctrines about the work and person of Christ, the Godhead, and the sacraments, but there are significant differences in the church when we talk about the kingdom of God, eschatology, free will vs. predestination, hermeneutics, etc. This doesn’t mean that I can’t also be united in common faith with the Presbyterian congregation I meet with when I am in Toronto for school. They preach the gospel there as well, and they also practice Christianity correctly, even though they think a little bit differently about the sacraments. What actually makes us one body, of one mind, and of one spirit. I don’t think it means that we all have to agree on the sacraments. I also don’t think it means that if we gather into our separate congregations based on our differing views on the sacraments that we are not of the same body, mind, or spirit.
 
In this post, I want to point out a few passages in the New Testament that indicate divisions which we all probably recognize as healthy (as opposed to unhealthy) for the Church, enabling Christians to better serve Christ. Afterwards, I want to begin to address modern denominations from the angle of this ancient church division, and put forward an idea I’ve been thinking of over the last couple of weeks since this all started: cooperative division. I’m sure someone’s written a book about it already, but it seems like a good place to start.
 
Ancient Healthy Church Division
 
Two of main passages that seem to indicate that the early Church was well aware of necessary division in the Church are from the letters of Jude and Galatians:
 
“Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.” (Jude 1:3-4 ESV)
 
“I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel–not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed. For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.” (Gal 1:6-10 ESV)
 
What is interesting about these passages is that they do not seem to indicate divisions within the Church, but divisions which for certain apostolic authors eliminate certain beliefs or gospels from being representative of Christian tradition. Paul can speak about the preaching of a gospel which is contrary to the real gospel, and Jude can speak about the faith delivered once and for all to the saints. For these authors, preaching a contrary gospel, a gospel which perverts the grace of God into sensuality and denies Christ, was worthy of being cursed, worthy for condemnation. From early on, then, it seems that the church had to carefully guard this faith.
 
This observation is clearly part of later church tradition, as seen, for instance, in the works of the Apologists (Irenaeus, Justin, Tertullian, etc). Most of their works were written to combat different “gospels.” Through their careful articulations of Christian belief, a rule of faith (regula fidei) came about, providing a measure by which differing understandings could be judged.
 
Healthy Church Tensions
 
At the same time, we have a whole group of examples where contrary facts or ideas are presented which the early church was more than comfortable putting side-by-side. Here, I am thinking principally of the fourfold Gospels, which are not as precise about the timing of the Passion week as we would like, but nonetheless are held in tension. Here, precise timing does not seem to be the point, but that does not negate the fact that the accounts indicate different times for different events.
 
We also have the two quotations of Genesis 15 in Romans and James:
 
For what does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness." Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness….We say that faith was counted to Abraham as righteousness. (Rom 4:3-5, 9 ESV)
 
What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith abut does not have works? Can that faith save him? If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, and one of you says to them, "Go in peace, be warmed and filled," without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that? So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead. But someone will say, "You have faith and I have works." Show me your faith aapart from your works, and I will show you my faith bby my works….Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar? You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works; and the Scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness"–and he was called a bfriend of God. You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone. (Jam 2:14-18, 21-24 ESV)
 
These seem to be arguing for two different conceptions about the outworking of the Christian life, one arguing for a life justified by faith and the other for works, respectively. Rather than trying to reconcile these passages, I wonder if they serve as examples where two different concepts of justification could become acceptable positions within the “faith once for all delivered to the saints”? Perhaps the early church knew where to draw the line between eliminating certain beliefs from orthodox Christianity (such as Arianism) and allowing differing positions on certain aspects of the tradition which differences are acceptable.
 
This might help when differentiating between how different denominations think through church polity, the celebration of the sacraments, views of predestination vs. free will, etc. Maybe our common faith leaves room (is this what people mean by a generous orthodoxy? I'm not thinking McLaren here) for certain doctrines to be articulated in different, yet healthy ways, while excluding other beliefs or doctrines from being Christian at all, excluded from the common faith.  This is a kind of cooperative division, where we can continue to advance the gospel into unreached parts of the world, continue to preach Christ at home, together, in our different congregations.
 
 
 
 
Andy

 

Categories: general Tags:

What kind of beginning is “In the beginning”?

June 27th, 2011 7 comments

Categories: Genesis, theology Tags:

Chain blog: Division and our Shared Humanity

June 21st, 2011 8 comments

A couple of days back my friend Alan Knox began a "chain blog" on the topic of divisiveness in the Church.  It's not so much a place where different bloggers get to voice off about their positions on certain divisive issues (e.g. eschatology, Calvinism, etc), but a place where we are trying to look more at the positive and negative sides of the divisions themselves.  How are we to handle Church division?  Is right to ever divide?  What are things to divide over (in love), and other things that we can agree to disagree about, but still be apart of the same assembly of Christians?  These are all important questions and so far a number of bloggers have responded with some great insight into the topic:

A good, fair review of Sailhamer’s “Meaning of the Pentateuch” by Stephen Dempster

May 4th, 2011 1 comment

Just wanted to post a link to Stephen Dempster's review of John Sailhamer's "The Meaning of the Pentateuch."  As a former Sailhamer student, I found his summary spot on, his praises due, and his criticisms enlightening and challenging.  You can read it here.  Also, if you haven't heard of Stephen Dempster, or if you have yet to read any of his books or articles, I really do encourage you to do so.  His book "Dominion and Dynasty" was a major influence in my thinking about the OT and its message.  He's also published several great articles:

How should we judge our reactions to Osama bin Laden’s death?

May 3rd, 2011 2 comments

I want to begin this note with a preface.  First, the good part: this is my 100th post!  Who would have guessed it would have been about this topic!  Thanks to all you who actually read these posts.  Continue to comment!  Now, more seriously.  I am not an ethicist.  I know that there are still holes in the way I think about the function of governments, their rights to take action for the protection of their citizens, and also in the ways I think about my own nationalism as an American and my commitment to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  I take seriously my citizenship in the kingdom of God, and want to honor YHWH in all that I do.  In what follows, I am offering my thoughts on where the rubber meets the road in all these areas.  I'm not arrogant enough to think what I say is right, but I do think I'm raising some interesting points that will hopefully lead into further discussion.  I'm writing these things to get my ideas flowing, hoping to receive some different points of view and insight that will help me better think about these things.  Some aspects of my ideas I'm happy with, but others I think are somewhat weak.  I invite you to challenge me, and hope that our discussion will help us think more biblically about our response.  Now, to the post.

I Gave In: A Review of Bell’s “Love Wins”

May 1st, 2011 No comments

I finally read (well, listened to the Audio Book of) Rob Bell's Love Wins.  It clarified a lot of things for me, and helped to either dismiss some of the criticism of the book as hearsay or misrepresentation, or confirm some of the criticism.

Jerome on Psalm 15

April 29th, 2011 No comments

While doing some initial research for a summer course I found a homily by Jerome of Psalm 15 that I thought to share.

Categories: psalter Tags: ,

Bad Behavior has blocked 136 access attempts in the last 7 days.